In this article I’m going to explain how to pick the right bicycle gear ratios.
With the help of a bicycle gear ratio chart we can understand what gear ratio is the one we like best and choose our bicycle gear ratios accordingly.
Video Tutorial
Why changing your bicycle gear ratio
There are a number of reasons why you would want to change your bicycle gear ratio.
Incorrect cadence
Older bicycles have far less gears than the 11 or even 12-speed bicycles of today. An 8-speed bicycle was considered a luxury in the 90s.
It also meant that not riding the gear you would like was commonplace as the jumps between gears could be too great to fit the cadence you would like. A specific gear would either feel too light or too heavy.
Chain alignment
The drivetrain of a bicycle is set up in such a way that the gear thought of to be most frequently used is the one that makes the chain point straight backwards towards the sprocket.
For a 7-speed running a triple crankset it would mean you’d run the middle chainring and the fourth sprocket most of the time for the bike’s intended use.
Running either a smaller or bigger gear would change this alignment making it more askew. Although this is intended behavior since gears are meant to be used, permanently using less optimal gearing results in increased wear of the drivetrain.
Since I live in the Netherlands, which is mostly flat, and I use mountain bike gearing for road use predominantly, I find myself using the upper ratio of the sprocket. Besides a skewed chain, it also leads to using the tiniest sprockets, applying the same amount of wear on a smaller amount of teeth. This also leads to increased wear.
And for my 9-speed Cannondale Killer V, there’s a noticeable difference between gear 7-9 versus gears 1-5, which are basically never used.
The bicycle gear ratios
Bicycle gear ratios guide us in determining what drivetrain setup is best suited for our riding style. It enables us to:
- Minimize drivetrain wear
- Minimize running out of gears for a single chainring and needing to shift the front derailleur
- Improving efficient pedaling by achieving optimal cadence
Bicycle gear ratio chart
A gear ratio is calculated by dividing the amount of teeth from the front chainring by the amount of teeth from a sprocket.
I left out the numbers for a granny ring (around 22 teeth) and started with a 29 chainring. This was the smallest chainring on my Super V. In turn this leads to the following table.
sprocket | 29 | 30 | 32 | 34 | 36 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 44 | 46 | 48 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 2.90 | 3.00 | 3.20 | 3.40 | 3.60 | 3.80 | 4.00 | 4.20 | 4.40 | 4.60 | 4.80 |
11 | 2.64 | 2.73 | 2.91 | 3.09 | 3.27 | 3.45 | 3.64 | 3.82 | 4.00 | 4.18 | 4.36 |
12 | 2.42 | 2.50 | 2.67 | 2.83 | 3.00 | 3.17 | 3.33 | 3.50 | 3.67 | 3.83 | 4.00 |
13 | 2.23 | 2.31 | 2.46 | 2.62 | 2.77 | 2.92 | 3.08 | 3.23 | 3.38 | 3.54 | 3.69 |
14 | 2.07 | 2.14 | 2.29 | 2.43 | 2.57 | 2.71 | 2.86 | 3.00 | 3.14 | 3.29 | 3.43 |
15 | 1.93 | 2.00 | 2.13 | 2.27 | 2.40 | 2.53 | 2.67 | 2.80 | 2.93 | 3.07 | 3.20 |
16 | 1.81 | 1.88 | 2.00 | 2.13 | 2.25 | 2.38 | 2.50 | 2.63 | 2.75 | 2.88 | 3.00 |
17 | 1.71 | 1.76 | 1.88 | 2.00 | 2.12 | 2.24 | 2.35 | 2.47 | 2.59 | 2.71 | 2.82 |
18 | 1.61 | 1.67 | 1.78 | 1.89 | 2.00 | 2.11 | 2.22 | 2.33 | 2.44 | 2.56 | 2.67 |
19 | 1.53 | 1.58 | 1.68 | 1.79 | 1.89 | 2.00 | 2.11 | 2.21 | 2.32 | 2.42 | 2.53 |
20 | 1.45 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 1.70 | 1.80 | 1.90 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.20 | 2.30 | 2.40 |
21 | 1.38 | 1.43 | 1.52 | 1.62 | 1.71 | 1.81 | 1.90 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.19 | 2.29 |
22 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.45 | 1.55 | 1.64 | 1.73 | 1.82 | 1.91 | 2.00 | 2.09 | 2.18 |
23 | 1.26 | 1.30 | 1.39 | 1.48 | 1.57 | 1.65 | 1.74 | 1.83 | 1.91 | 2.00 | 2.09 |
24 | 1.21 | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.42 | 1.50 | 1.58 | 1.67 | 1.75 | 1.83 | 1.92 | 2.00 |
25 | 1.16 | 1.20 | 1.28 | 1.36 | 1.44 | 1.52 | 1.60 | 1.68 | 1.76 | 1.84 | 1.92 |
26 | 1.12 | 1.15 | 1.23 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.46 | 1.54 | 1.62 | 1.69 | 1.77 | 1.85 |
27 | 1.07 | 1.11 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.48 | 1.56 | 1.63 | 1.70 | 1.78 |
28 | 1.04 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 1.21 | 1.29 | 1.36 | 1.43 | 1.50 | 1.57 | 1.64 | 1.71 |
29 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.24 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.45 | 1.52 | 1.59 | 1.66 |
30 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 1.20 | 1.27 | 1.33 | 1.40 | 1.47 | 1.53 | 1.60 |
31 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 1.03 | 1.10 | 1.16 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 1.35 | 1.42 | 1.48 | 1.55 |
32 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.13 | 1.19 | 1.25 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.44 | 1.50 |
Step 1. Determining optimal bicycle gear ratios
Bicycle gear ratios are rider-specific. Different riders have different bike types, different preferred cadences, and different rider environments: flat vs hilly, road vs off-road. Based on these variables you can determine your preferred bicycle gear ratios.
I’m going to reverse engineer my bicycle gear ratios based on data derived from using 3 different bikes:
They’re all mountain bikes I have used for riding on flat tarmac. My cadence is rider specific, not bike specific, meaning it’s the same for all three bikes. So by plotting my preferred gear ratio on the chart I can reverse engineer what ratio is optimal for me.
In turn I can use this ratio to finetune a new drivetrain setup for the Killer V, which is worn and in need of replacement.
Cannondale M300 bicycle gear ratios

- Crankset: 28-38-48
- Cassette: 7-speed | 11-13-15-18-21-24-28
Which leads to the following chart:
Sprocket | 38 | 48 |
---|---|---|
11 | 3.45 | 4.36 |
13 | 2.92 | 3.69 |
15 | 2.53 | 3.20 |
18 | 2.11 | 2.67 |
21 | 1.81 | 2.29 |
24 | 1.58 | 2.00 |
28 | 1.36 | 1.71 |
The optimal gear for the bike would be the fourth gear (38-18). But I frequently went back and forth between fourth and fifth gear, which is an indication that the optimal bicycle gear ratio lies between 2.11 and 2.53 for standard road use.
I also know that with heavy climbs on the trail the 1.36 was way too big. I definitely need a sub-1.00 gear ratio for really steep climbing.
Cannondale Super V bicycle gear ratios

- Crankset: 29-44
- Cassette: 8-speed | 11-13-15-17-19-21-24-28
Sprocket | 29 | 44 |
---|---|---|
11 | 2.64 | 4.00 |
13 | 2.23 | 3.38 |
15 | 1.93 | 2.93 |
17 | 1.71 | 2.59 |
19 | 1.53 | 2.32 |
21 | 1.38 | 2.10 |
24 | 1.21 | 1.83 |
28 | 1.04 | 1.57 |
On flat tarmac I’m always on the seventh sprocket, which corresponds to a 2.23 gear ratio. That’s exactly what we would expect based on the sweet spot we determined from the M300 gear ratio, which was roughly between 2.1 and 2.5.
This full-suspension mountain bike is used on rougher terrain that features steep climbs. I swapped out both chainrings, which means the CODA crank now has a 32 and 44 setup.
Sprocket | 32 | 44 |
---|---|---|
11 | 2.91 | 4.00 |
13 | 2.46 | 3.38 |
15 | 2.13 | 2.93 |
17 | 1.88 | 2.59 |
19 | 1.68 | 2.32 |
21 | 1.52 | 2.10 |
24 | 1.33 | 1.83 |
28 | 1.14 | 1.57 |
The bigger chainring in the front didn’t mean I could ride a lower gear. The jump between a 13-teeth sprocket to a 15-teeth one meant I would ride a 2.13 ratio. And we already saw that the 2.11 ratio on the M300 always felt too light.
I could’ve opted for a 34 or even a 36 front chainring, but that would probably get me into trouble on the climbs, because the crank doesn’t have a granny ring.
Cannondale Killer V bicycle gear ratios

- Crankset: 22-32-44
- Cassette: 9-speed | 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28-32
Which leads to the following chart:
Sprocket | 32 | 44 |
---|---|---|
11 | 2.91 | 4.00 |
12 | 2.67 | 3.67 |
14 | 2.29 | 3.14 |
16 | 2.00 | 2.75 |
18 | 1.78 | 2.44 |
21 | 1.52 | 2.10 |
24 | 1.33 | 1.83 |
28 | 1.14 | 1.57 |
32 | 1.00 | 1.38 |
Based on these gear ratios, you’d expect me to run the seventh gear predominantly, since 2.29 fits nicely between the M300’s 2.11 and 2.53. And as it happens, this is true.
If I’m warmed up, I pick the 32-12 gear for a 2.67 ratio, but oftentimes go to the big ring for the 2.44 and 2.75 ratio as well.
As you can clearly see, for road-use of this bike I’m always in the upper range of gears.
Calculating the optimal bicycle gear ratio
Looking at gear ratios I used on three individual bikes that have similar characteristics I can calculate the optimal bicycle gear ratio.
You take the gear ratios of the upper and lower gear most often used and divide it by two. If you add another bike your division needs to be doubled.
(lower gear ratio + higher gear ratio)/2
Since I can use three bikes my calculation looks like this
((M300 lower gear ratio + higher gear ratio) + (Super V lower gear ratio + higher gear ratio) + (Killer V lower gear ratio + higher gear ratio)) / 6
or
(2.11 + 253 + 2.23 + 2.64 + 2.29 + 2.67) / 6 = 2.41
This number absolutely makes sense looking back each bicycle’s chart and how I use the gears.
Step 2. Determining a new drivetrain setup
I’m looking to replace the entire drivetrain setup for the Cannondale Killer V.
2.41 represents a gear ratio most often used between these bikes and belonging to my preferred cadence.
Now we need to find a drivetrain setup with the help of the bicycle gear ratio chart where the 5th or middle gear of the 9-speed is closest to my preferred ratio of 2.41.
It means the most often used gear will allow for the widest range in gears for my type of riding, the least amount of chain skewing and drivetrain wear, and the lowest frequency of chainring shifting.
I cannot achieve this with the cassette alone. I also need the front chainring to move up in the amount of teeth.
As a general rule of thumb, going two teeth up on the front chainring means you can go one gear lower in the back.
For the 9-speed I need to go to 5th gear. Currently I’m using 7 and 8 the most. Since I currently run a 32. Moving up to 34 with the same cassette would see me doing 6 and 7. 36 would see me move into 5 and 6 territory.
Based on this rule 36 seems to be the way.
But not all cassettes are equal with almost all of them jumping teeth when the number goes up. By filling in the chart you can see the most optimal cassette for you.
In my case I need to switch from a Deore XT mountain bike cassette to a road bike one. For instance the Shimano Ultegra CS-6500 9-speed cassette.
CS-6500 sprocket teeth combinations
Deore XT 9-speed Ultegra CS-6500 9-speed
The CS-6500 offers the following sprocket teeth combinations
11 – 21T | 11–12 –13 –14 –15 — 16 –17 — 19 — 21 T |
11 – 23T | 11–12 –13 –14 –15 — 17 –19 — 21 — 23 T |
12 – 21T | 12 –13 –14 –15 — 16 –17 — 18 — 19 — 21 T |
12 – 23T | 12 –13 –14 –15 — 16 –17 — 19 — 21 — 23 T |
12 – 25T | 12 –13 –14 –15 — 17 –19 — 21 — 23 — 25 T |
12 – 27T | 12 –13 –14 –15 — 17 –19 — 21 — 24 — 27 T |
13 – 23T | 13 –14 –15 — 16 –17 — 18 — 19 — 21 — 23 T |
13 – 25T | 13 –14 –15 — 16 –17 — 19 — 21 — 23 — 25 T |
14 – 25T | 14 –15 — 16 –17 — 18 — 19 — 21 — 23 — 25 T |
The 15-teeth sprocket (15T) in combination with a 36 chainring leads to a 2.40 gear ratio, which is just about perfect.
Cassettes starting with 12, 13, and 14 can all be scrubbed, because the 15T is in fourth, third, or second place, which is not what you want.
That leaves the 11 -21T or the 11- 23T. If you map them to the chart it looks like this:
CS-6500 with 36T chainring | 11-21T | 11-23T |
---|---|---|
11 | 3.27 | 3.27 |
12 | 3.00 | 3.00 |
13 | 2.77 | 2.77 |
14 | 2.57 | 2.57 |
15 | 2.40 | 2.40 |
16 | 2.25 | |
17 | 2.12 | 2.12 |
19 | 1.89 | 1.89 |
21 | 1.71 | 1.71 |
23 | 1.57 |
I really like the uninterrupted flow from 17 all the way up to 11 from the 11-21T version. It means that I have 2 gears below my preferred bicycle gear ratio and four above it.
I did consider wanting to sprint away from stop signs with the help of the 1.57. But I’d rather have the 16T 2.25 at my disposal which sits just below the 2.40.
So there you have it. Picking a new drivetrain setup with the help of calculated bicycle gear ratios.